Exactly.
There's a sample used in here. I imagine this is just one of the samples you found. I imagine there are many more like this. It's 800 Place Victoria in Montreal, referred to on page 215. Apparently, there is a tendering process there. This is the building they're already in. They rank fourth in the evaluation process, and then to quote:
Two weeks after the tendering process had closed and the winning bidder had been selected, the Secretary of State for the Agency sent a letter to the Minister of PWGSC
--this is the Economic Development Agency--
asking him to renew the lease at Place Victoria. The Minister of PWGSC approved the renewal of the lease at Place Victoria.
This was the fourth-place bidder. It's obviously unacceptable, it seems to me.
Several questions arise. Who owns the building? Have you any idea who owns that building?