I would certainly like to look at those documents. I'm not aware of those documents. I can tell you that in the final analysis, what persuaded the Crown was that there was no evidence that any money had gone from any of the pension funds or the insurance system into any individual's pocket. That was very persuasive to the crown attorney after an extensive and thorough investigation. With all of the interviews, the 75,000 pages of support documents, and the forensic audit, they could not prove that any money had gone into any individual's pocket, which is the determining factor for misappropriation of funds.
On February 21st, 2007. See this statement in context.