I want to make my point, though.
Their finding was that there was not sufficient evidence to proceed with any criminal prosecution, so my concern is the purpose of this meeting. Is the purpose of the meeting for us to sit around and overrule the crown prosecutor and say they don't know their job and we know better? I think that's problematic. I'm not in a position to make that kind of judgment. He's an experienced crown counsel, and I think those are important considerations.