I'm not sure what doing it right means. Often accounting treatment and legal obligations through appropriations can result in a conflict, so in my view there's no simple answer to this. I know people are perhaps looking for one, but there's not.
I think every case has to be looked at on its own merits, and we have to determine what the overall advice is. The best way to deal with this on a go-forward basis is to ensure that there is ample opportunity for the Comptroller General to have discussions with the AG, so that we can basically make a determination on what the accounting treatment is well in advance of these.
So I cannot make a point that there's a right or wrong answer. I think it does very much vary from case to case.