We didn't do the specific analysis to see what was new programs and what was carried forward from previous years. I think that would be a worthwhile analysis, perhaps, for the committee. But if you look at the table on page 38, the average during the eight-year period was, I think, 4.5% or something, and the surplus was over 10%. The 4.5% would have certainly been an indication of spending that would have to occur in any case, surplus or deficit, if it was incurring then. I wouldn't say a large percentage of it was probably due to being in a surplus position.
On February 28th, 2007. See this statement in context.