The executive director is currently employed by the office in that capacity, and his duties and responsibilities were reviewed, along with all of the management control practices in the office, post the receipt of the 2004 briefing on the first audit from the Auditor General and then specifically with the interim consultant and senior financial officer who I retained after receiving the November 28 report from the Auditor General. So his role was also part of the audit. I think you will find in the audit report that it's very clear that he had no part in approving the issues, nor did he benefit from them, and as a consequence of the reviews that have been done internally and externally, there has also been no reason for disciplinary action.
There have, however, been a number of corrective issues in the office in terms of process and procedure.