You agree. You are nodding.
I have a hard time understanding. You say you act quickly, but at the same time, when Mr. Lewis came forward with information, you already knew that this would probably implicate Mr. Ewanovich and Mr. Crupi. Nevertheless, in July 2003, you agreed that Mr. Ewanovich and Mr. Crupi should receive an annual performance bonus at the maximum rate possible. More than that, Mr. Ewanovich's contract that was due to expire in October 2003 was prolonged until October 2004. This is information provided by Mr. Lewis.
I have difficulty understanding. You were in receipt of information implicating these two persons, but based on an assessment, you gave them performance bonuses in addition of renewing the contract of one of them. Then, four months later, you have these people removed from their position. It is a strange process that is hard to follow.
I would like an explanation.