But the question is the reverse. What would have been the cost—because those delay costs were basically there to maintain the system, at $1.8 million per month—had it not been incurred, if the company had been told to put it on the shelf, on the back burner? Would the system have been functional when it was needed? What costs would have been entailed in opportunity cost loss and actual dollar cost? Do we have any idea of that?
On May 30th, 2006. See this statement in context.