I think so, yes, given that this was a very unusual situation, where it was appropriations, that there was an existing contract and the work that was being done was done under an agreement in principle.
The agreement in principle had four conditions, none of which had been fulfilled. One was that the agreement in principle had to be approved by Treasury Board, that the contract amendment had to be executed, that the actual service effective date of the system, performance of the system, had to be delivered December of 2003, and there was a fourth condition, which dealt with verification of pricing. None of those conditions had been met. Therefore, this was a very complex situation where we said we probably need to get some legal advice on this, because within the secretariat there were differing views and therefore the decision was made to try to clarify legal application.