I believe at the time the facts were very uncertain. We had verbal recollections from the centre as to the nature of the arrangement, but we had a lack of clarity in the details. So there was some advice provided by the OCG that the costs should be accrued and charged in appropriations. That was in the middle of January.
That assumed certain things, and one of those things was that this would proceed to Treasury Board for a formal contract amendment. In other words, had the contract been amended, it would have represented a legitimate and legal charge on the appropriation. That was the working assumption at that point.