At a point in time, I thought those were the only two. I should also point out that there was a question of urgency. We were very seized with the fact that the window was quickly closing to obtain supplementary estimates that year. I think we had a few days left to get a submission into Treasury Board. In exercising my duty, I wanted to advise the minister of that possibility.
Had this issue surfaced even two or three weeks earlier, and we'd had a chance to do the due diligence on the issue, I would not have had any need to advise the minister of the need for supplementary estimates, because the conclusion reached was that we could operate within the appropriation, that this additional charge was not to be accounted for.