--that the evidence was clear that because of the way he was interviewing and the way he was conducting himself, the decision was made at the highest levels of the RCMP to have him taken off this investigation. There was the suggestion that this was done at your behest, and you're saying it wasn't at your behest.
Now, my secondary question is: the evidence that they used to serve the order--I know you haven't seen the order--you don't agree with?