On a point of clarification, I want this witness here. Obviously the member feels he can shed some light on it. I think it's key when we're planning our meetings that he's at the right meeting.
We have an outsourcing issue with Dominic Crupi--and that's one kettle of fish--we have a pension thing that's internal in the RCMP, we have the insurance issue, and we have the Ottawa police force investigation. In a lot of ways, they're different. I think we should have a focus at our meetings so that our witnesses are dealing with the main topic when we're hearing it. Perhaps the member could shed some light on which area he'd be most helpful in.