Yes, I just think it's important for you to establish, as chair, a consistent set of rules regarding how members can intervene to continue their questioning when it appears to them that their clock is being run down. I know other members from the other side intervened numerous times to shorten the responses of witnesses. You had no problem with that, and I think you were conducting yourself appropriately in not intervening in their method of questioning.
The public can see these hearings, they can judge whether or not members are behaving properly, so I would just hope you would establish a consistent methodology as opposed to picking and choosing how individual witnesses will be treated.
Thank you.