There are actually two parts to your question that have to do with timelines, past and present. Being put in place as we speak through the proposed public servants protection act is a very robust and formal system to allow people to come forward.
The prior Royal Canadian Mounted Police Act stated that every member who finds a wrongdoing or a misconduct issue, whether it involves a peer or a supervisor, etc., has the responsibility to come forward to their supervisor. I believe the issue in that situation in the past was that the system was not as robust as it should have been in certain circumstances. In some cases, the issues were not managed properly.
One of the things that I did in the meantime was ask the ethics adviser to put out a note to everyone with my endorsement, saying that if there are any lingering issues, either past or present, that need to be dealt with, they should be, and we are anxious to do that.
Also, we are off the mark already. We have named people to be the designated officer for the new public servants protection act. I have issued communications to make sure people understand that this leadership is anxious to manage conflict properly.
There will always be conflict in organizations such as the RCMP, where there are a lot of type A personalities, a lot of very assertive people. But these conflicts need to be managed properly.