Yes, and it says right here, in written order number 3, “that you report for duty in person by 15h00”. It doesn't say anything about health. It wouldn't say removed, but it doesn't indicate anything at all about there being health concerns, and yet Deputy Commissioner George twice gave evidence that it was for health reasons.
Then just to complicate things further, Commissioner, we had the accusation against Staff Sergeant Frizzell that it was because of his interrogation techniques, that he had witnesses fleeing out of a room crying and screaming, and that this was part of the reason—which Inspector Roy then included in his final answer. But the first time he was asked, it was just very straight up: he stopped working there because the investigation was completed. And yet, Commissioner, you're using the word “removed”.
With the greatest respect, ma'am—and I mean this sincerely, with the greatest respect—I appreciate that you have some investigation going on to get to the bottom of this, but the reason we're in this public domain, ma'am, is that the internal processes within the RCMP failed Canadians, and so that's not going to be sufficient. I'm sure it will be helpful, and I'm sure you have the finest officers on it; I have no doubt. Nonetheless, it's a question of some of these internal things. You used the word “conclusively”, I believe. With the greatest respect, Commissioner, it will not be conclusive if it's done internally.