Unfortunately, we really don't know. The backlog in the DNA analysis is increasing, even though, as we mention in the report, there was additional funding given in a greater percentage than the actual increase in cases.
One of the explanations given to us was the case in B.C., the Pickton case, which obviously involved a lot of DNA analysis. But they received additional funding for that. The problem is that they don't have enough information to be able to substantiate the effect that particular case may have had on their backlog.
What we are recommending to them is that they really need to have a process study done to understand what is happening in their process: are there delays at certain points along the way, and what does it take to resolve this backlog, which has been an issue for many years now?