We didn't specifically look at the security issue. We were really looking at the information that was available to the managers in the various missions. We noted, I think in a couple of the missions, that there was no indication of the security check having been done. That doesn't necessarily mean that it wasn't done; it's just that the documentation wasn't in the file.
We're saying the greater issue with the local engaged staff is that these missions need to have much more support from Foreign Affairs. It is very complex to manage locally engaged staff, because they have their own local laws. With the rotation of people through the missions, one can't expect the head of mission to be aware of all the laws in that country in dealing with personnel. They need to have much more support from head office and much better information.