Your word is good enough for me, sir. That's fine; I'll drop this.
I want to move on to page 3. Shooting for the top of the page again, we've been here once, and I want to return. This is in your report, Mr. McEvoy:
For the additional NCPC contract reviewed, not involving Mr. Brazeau, we determined that this contract was awarded by CAC to a contractor for services that were already performed.
This is good news for the RCMP:
Further, we were informed that RCMP procurement had refused to award this contract and that Ms. Van Schaik, Senior Consultant arranged for a contract to be awarded with this knowledge.
Could you tell us about that, please?