Okay.
Now, I'm in a real mushy area with some of your answers in a certain area here, and I'd like some clarity, so I'm going to give you some room to clarify this.
In one breath, you told me that you'd told this committee that Crupi was into Public Works, and I didn't really have to worry about that because Public Works would take care of it. At another hearing, you told us you had cancelled Dominic Crupi's ability to contract, and you really didn't know he was doing these things.
Now, which is it? Is it that you were confident that Public Works would have the checks and balances to control Mr. Crupi, or was it the answer you gave before, that you had cancelled his contract and privileges and you just didn't know that he was doing this? It was only $6 million. You knew all about the $580,000 and all the charging and re-entries, and so on, but $6 million could flow right through Mr. Crupi in contracts to this network he had created, and you didn't....
What's your answer to that?