Okay. Thank you for that. And I was allowing you to go on.
I'm going to mention a couple of things. I know I'm going to run out of time before I'm finished, so I'm just going to run like hell.
I want to just say this to Mr. Estabrooks--and he may get a chance to comment. This potential delay, if the delay was purposeful in terms of the legal things and everything, if it's ultimately proven by the public inquiry, which I believe still will happen, that this was a delay, it could play into the statute of limitations issue we ran into, where people who were found to be held accountable couldn't be because the time limitations had expired. So it might be interesting to see whether or not there is a linkage to some deliberate ragging the puck, and then something that was key in all of this that just happened to turn on a statute of limitations issue.
Mr. Lavoie, what is your understanding, sir, of what happened on the day Mr. Estabrooks is talking about, when Mr. Gauvin's assistant went in? What is your understanding of what took place?