It's interesting that you say that, because a number of us at the committee just came from a seminar where we were speaking on departmental performance reports and the concept of the negative information having to be presented as well as the positive information. I compliment you for putting that negative information on the table and being prepared to address it. This is good.
A number of years ago you tabled a report setting out the criteria by which you would evaluate departmental performance reports. I was hoping that your analysis on a random basis of departmental performance reports would be a standard part of your report. Can we look forward to that so that departments know that they may have to come to the public accounts committee and explain to us why they forgot to put in the negative information?