Thank you.
Again, that particular question has been of concern. We addressed it with the heads of prosecution a couple of weeks ago at their annual meeting and again last week with the FPT ADMs in Calgary.
The response is that quality assurance at the scientific level was in place from the very beginning. The issue was that the quality issue our scientists were challenged with and were resolving was not recorded as a quality issue and reported to management so we could resolve it on a system-wide basis, or in fact learn from it on a system-wide basis. That, I believe, was a result of our accreditation activities.