I'll start by replying, if I might, Mr. Laforest, and then I'll pass the mike, if I could, to my colleague.
Certainly, without putting words in the Auditor General's mouth, I don't think we're where we were at in the 1930s with regard to the labs or lab science; we have made some incredible progress over the last number of years.
Having said that, as I said, we have accepted the Auditor General's recommendations and are prepared and anxious to move forward. One of the issues about the process and management systems is that, in conjunction with her recommendations, we have hired process engineers to help us get through to the next level of competency when it comes to dealing with these incredibly complex issues arising specifically around DNA and the complex processes in which we are engaged there.
All of that is to say that we are not in denial about the fact that over the last five to six years it has been a moving goal post and that we have certainly missed the mark in a number of cases, in a number of instances, and in a number of areas. But we are most anxious and have worked very hard since these things were brought to our attention. And as we work with the Auditor General's reports and recommendations, we will make sure that the next report to be tabled in the fall will give this body, and other bodies, confidence that we are paying attention to our responsibilities.
I will pass this on now to Joe, if he has anything more to say.