I would say no. The major issue we had was the isolation of DNA from some samples in cases. As Mr. Buckle has indicated, in the 216 cases where there was some concern, 87% had other probative results. We do not always obtain DNA from every case; routinely, within 4% to 6% of our cases we do not isolate DNA. So whether we missed information that might have been there is very difficult to assess with the technologies we have in place.
On May 28th, 2007. See this statement in context.