Mr. Chair, we don't get into trying to understand why certain things were said or not said, but we do believe there was a potential that the committee may have, at best, been confused by the testimony that was given. There's a table, an exhibit, in the report at the very end, on page 31, that sets out some of the statements that were made and what our audit found. I think there was the potential, at least, that the members of the committee may not have appreciated some of the nuances in definition and may have used a more usual form of defining backlog, for example. So that was our concern and I think that was the concern of the committee when they asked us to follow up on these conflicting testimonies.
On May 28th, 2007. See this statement in context.