In dealing with first nations, as you go through these reports, it becomes quite apparent that we have third party management. And what does that entail? We go into the reports and we find that there are 60,000 reports from some 600 first nations per year, approximately a report from every first nation every three days. Then we find out in those same reports that most of those reports are not, in fact, being read.
When it comes to the issue of mould in housing, what are the results of all of those reports? I'm quoting: “the scale of the problem has not been identified, priorities for action have not been established, and no overall plan for co-ordinating federal organizations' efforts or monitoring overall progress has been developed”.
What have we actually achieved when it comes to mould in housing? In 2003, three years ago, we established a committee. What has that committee done, concretely? Nothing. So people are still living in this mouldy housing.
In the government response to the Auditor General's report, they state on housing, and I quote, “Moving forward will continue to require sustained management attention.” This sort of attention is that you require reports, reports that aren't read, that result in action or inaction. What it appears to be is that reports are there for one reason, to duck responsibility, just as the deputy minister appears to have ducked responsibility here today.
Mr. LeBlanc, at the beginning of the meeting, we asked that you find out whether or not the deputy minister would make himself available later on in this meeting. Your assistant left. You have a note that she brought back to you. Could you please read the contents of that note?