No, not the evidence, but the names, the senders and recipients of the e-mails. Then we can judge at that point how to proceed, once we have those names.
I do believe it is of relevance. There's a significant difference if these are e-mails between minor officials or e-mails between senior levels of the RCMP. What I'm suggesting is a way to perhaps protect individuals who have been or may be subject to a criminal investigation while at the same time doing our due diligence and knowing what the sources are of these particular e-mails and who the recipients were.