I would hope we could bring this to a conclusion, Mr. Chairman. We have heard Staff Sergeant Frizzell's concern about his oath, and I'm glad that he takes it seriously. He is now apprised that parliamentary privilege trumps his oath. Therefore, I would suggest that he be judicious, if he feels somewhat constrained when he quotes from e-mails, but I would not have him feel that he can't.
If you, Mr. Chairman, on behalf of this committee, direct him to answer that question, then he is required, as our law clerk, Mr. Tardi, has told us, to answer all questions put to him, which overrides and supersedes the oath that he has with the RCMP. Each time a name comes up that he feels that under his professional conduct he can't name, he can be directed by you to do so, and in that way he is protected by his oath and fulfills his obligation to the general public.