We are talking here about a contract valued at $65,912. The next contract was for $108,780. You made this recommendation without having seen their work, even if you had knowledge of their abilities. Then, you sent an e-mail to Mr. Brazeau to thank him for his offer to grant a sole source contract to Casey Computing Solutions in June 2002 for a value of $25,000. I am talking ethics here. Other companies could have applied and probably did.
How can you explain to the public that you continuously favoured the same company?