Okay. I'm looking at the audit again. On page 82, Mr. Onischuk sent an e-mail, dated December 2002, to Mr. Brazeau, which states:
Good afternoon, Frank:
The purpose of this message is to make you aware that NCPC has a requirement for a Information Security Technical Analyst....
--and it goes on--
Attached is a statement of work. NCPC preferred contractor would be Alan F. Armstrong. I would like to have Mr. Armstrong working as soon as possible.
So you were taking direction from Mr. Onischuk and saying, okay, if that's what he wants, that's what he gets. Why did you do that?