I'm sorry, I can't sit back quietly. I agree entirely with Mr. Pelletier. We've been very clear. I've been part of this process at almost every committee meeting and at the steering committee meeting, and I understand fully the process, and we were clearly talking about this. We've had processes where we've whittled these things down, based on legal advice and long discussions. We conveyed to Mr. Pelletier that these are the questions, be ready to be grilled, to answer questions about discrepancies that exist.
To suggest to him now that there are other questions is patently unfair. I think we would have to internally change what we were going to do, notify the witness and give him ample time to respond. I think it's patently unfair, given the process we've followed, the document in front of us, that what you read at the beginning.... I think it's unfair to the witness to suddenly change the rules in mid-stream, and that's the way it looks to me.