I'm not exactly sure what he's meaning about this oath that he has now referred to that seemed, in his opinion, to take precedence over his oath and his requirements and obligations to be truthful and forthcoming to this particular committee when he appeared here before.
We do know that Mr. Guité appeared in camera. That testimony was made public, according to certain conditions, at a later date, and he also appeared in public.
At no point in time do I recall anything of any kind being said that he was bound by a higher oath in giving his testimony