What my colleagues and I are having a hard time with is that you testified that you knew Mr. Crupi was doing things that were wrong, inappropriate, with contracting. You were aware of that. Then you sent him to PWGSC with absolutely no heads-up. I would like you to think about somebody doing that directly to your department.
You left him in charge of a very sophisticated project, the outsourcing of the pension fund, which we've also heard plenty of testimony describing as very difficult to handle. That escalated to 250% higher than what was originally given as a number for this transition. I am finding it very difficult to believe you would send someone, first, and expect Public Works and Government Services to whip him into shape. They didn't do their job; however, you have no responsibility if you just ship him off. You don't even send a memo to say maybe you had just better keep an eye on that department where you left this staff person—although he's now under the guise of PWGSC with contracting—just to make sure that it is going okay.
Can you give me an answer to that?