Perhaps I didn't make myself clear. We're asking an official, who no longer represents the Crown, for information that person has of whatever transpired in the set of circumstances. Just because that person, at a different point in time, happened to have represented the Crown, that's totally separate. Should it not be considered separate from that individual? The Crown is not an individual; an individual is embraced during that timeframe. So even if you ask questions, you're asking questions of information that a person has of a person who, at a point in time, encompassed the Crown. So it's....
On June 13th, 2007. See this statement in context.