That's fine. I accept that. Implied would be the suggestion that maybe somebody else doesn't care quite as much about that.
I would say to the honourable member with great respect that that holds until the day comes when there is a constitutional interpretation or advice given by the law clerk of Parliament, and we go down one road, maybe based on that advice or maybe not, and then possibly that same advice, because it's in the public domain, is used against Parliament in front of the courts.
That was my only reason for raising it--to protect the ability of this committee and Parliament to defend its actions when it takes a course. But if nobody else is concerned about that, then I'm perfectly fine with our doing this in public.