Mr. Chairman, this is somewhat in reaction to what Ms. Sgro said, but I would like to specify that this motion is in order. I do not believe it is necessary to wait for Mr. Pelletier's response. The two things can happen in tandem. The fact that the Chair of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts wrote a letter to the Privy Council requesting some information regarding this situation is not necessarily in contradiction with the fact that Mr. Pelletier has given us his version of events. I support the motion as amended.
On June 13th, 2007. See this statement in context.