I'm inclined to agree with Mr. Laforest. This is a good debate—the point of order about how the Auditor General reports to Parliament and our committee and so on—but when I look at the motion itself, the motion looks to me to be a valid motion before this committee. I don't think the point of order should derail that motion, unless I'm missing something.
On June 13th, 2007. See this statement in context.