I just want to clarify, is this what we're agreeing to? I just want to make sure everybody understands that we're actually, right now, as this motion stands, agreeing to have all six of these witnesses at the same time. I would suggest that's probably not the proper way to go about this. It seems to me that in committees I've been to where ministers have been involved, they've been involved on their own. So I would suggest that possibly having the current Minister of Public Safety here as a witness on his own might be the proper way to go about it, whether it's two different meetings, one before the other.
On June 18th, 2007. See this statement in context.