It's actually not, because I'm talking exclusively about whether there should be a meeting. In fact, I'm proposing that there should be two.
I was asked specifically by Mr. Christopherson to deliver a rationale, and that's exactly what I'm doing. I'm simply proposing that the single group be divided into two; I'm proposing that the motion be amended to call for two meetings on the matter.
I suppose Mr. Wrzesnewskyj would accept that as a friendly amendment.