The government in Canada comes ahead of the children in need of child support. If that's the case, I probably take issue with it. In my view, that one should have a priority over the government in Canada.
The report says the riskiest files aren't given priority, or should be given priority. Auditor General, am I to assume, when you refer to giving priority to the riskiest files, that these would be people who may have the ability to pay a good deal of the debt and who may have large holdings and assets, but are risks because they could move offshore or leave the country, thus escaping the ability of the tax department to access their assets? What were you thinking of when you were talking about riskiest files?