If I may, I'll add to Mr. Kennedy's comments.
You will remember that with Mr. Justice O'Connor's report, there was a second part. We asked him to review the possibility of new review or oversight mechanisms for the RCMP as it related to their national security activities. Mr. Kennedy has already commented on that.
What we had obviously hoped to do was take Mr. Justice O'Connor's report and at that point take the opportunity to refashion the public complaints commission. We understood after 9/11 that it was because of the expansion of the RCMP's role as it related to national security and the emphasis on pre-emption and prevention and detection, much of which cannot be transparent but has to be covert and so on, that we needed to take a serious look at review and oversight.
Mr. Justice O'Connor was requested to do one piece of that, and he did an exceptional job. I was very pleased to see Minister Day indicate, after the public inquiry put in place during our tenure, that he was going to move on Mr. Justice O'Connor's recommendations. I think that now is the time, based on what we've learned from O'Connor and other things—what we're learning here—to take a really thorough look at what kinds of review mechanisms you need for a modern, 21st century police force, with all the challenges it faces.