No, so it's just the commissioner, deputy commissioner.... Okay.
Regarding the internal audit that was taking place, we've heard that the auditor had said he'd never seen so many red flags. He should have stopped the audit, and a criminal investigation should have begun. That did not happen. The audit was presented that fall to SEC.
By the way, Mr. Aiken, the auditor, reported to Mr. Gauvin, who was the comptroller, after all, a deputy commissioner. What's interesting is that we've heard in testimony here that a former assistant commissioner, Gordon Clark, has indicated that Mr. Gauvin had a file of all of the inappropriate requests that the former Commissioner Zaccardelli had made. Former Assistant Commissioner Gordon Clark has indicated he'd be willing to testify before this committee. Mr. Zaccardelli claimed no recollection of that meeting and discussion of that particular issue.
Mr. Gauvin is Mr. Aiken's superior. I would assume Mr. Aiken would have gone to Mr. Gauvin. The audit did not stop. It was concluded. The audit results came forward before SEC. You have all the top officials within the RCMP on the senior executive committee.
What happened? Why did it take until March of the following year, only after the whistle-blowers went to the offices of Anne McLellan, Reg Alcock, and Sheila Fraser? Why did nothing happen? Everyone on SEC had a copy of that report. They heard those allegations. So do you have any idea of what transpired? Why did no one take action?