Thanks.
That raises a couple of things. You don't have to comment on this if you don't want to; I'm just going to throw it out there.
Earlier the ethics advisor.... I raised that whole issue about their being part of the structure and whether that causes any problems. I don't know if you heard any of that. Do you have any thoughts on it? I was pretty much dismissed, from her point of view and that of her predecessor, in the sense that, no, it's not the case, that the integrity of the individual is enough, and structurally you ought not to worry. And yet you just talked about a very similar issue where you identified the need for that arm's length.
Do you have any thoughts or comments? And I'll accept no.