Thank you.
My concern would be that we would have to rely on the integrity of the individual in the position. Structurally, it still gives me some concern that somebody may come forward and ask for advice on how to do this without blowing their career, or for advice on all the things you would ask. Meanwhile, in the back of the assistant commissioner's mind, they're still thinking of the accountability I have to the commissioner. It just seems to me that the whole structural thing, where you're part of the command mechanism, doesn't necessarily lend itself to giving people the best advice vis-à-vis actions that might hurt the organization.
I don't have a lot of time, so can you incorporate your answer into that, if you don't mind?
I want to come back to the issue of what would be different. Mr. Lake asked the question I was looking at.
Assistant Commissioner, I appreciate and respect your answer, but I didn't hear a lot of meat. I didn't hear of steps. What I'd really like to hear, which I think is what Mr. Lake was seeking, is this. If this unfolded the same way—and we all know the story now, but with things being different in your office—what steps would there now be, different from what they were in the past, that might prevent us from getting to this point in time?