Of course, you do know that the proof's going to be in the pudding. It's going to be what happens after this report, whether it's fulsome enough, and then going about implementing it.
But again, I would strongly urge you to recognize that from our viewpoint literally all of the uniformed, on-the-street, front-line officers are looking to you for the change that will be brought not only by you as the commissioner, but by those senior ranks. Every time I talked to front-line officers, that was the most disappointing thing. It wasn't necessarily that there was human frailty--these things happen--but that there was so much of it in the very senior ranks. It's demoralizing, because if the top doesn't believe, why the heck should anybody on the street believe? They're the ones out there putting their lives on the line. So that is really critical.
I have so many questions.
Professor, I want to ask you two quick things. I'm curious. I went through your report and happened to notice--and I'm sure there's a logical reason, it just sticks in my craw, and I can't figure out what it is--pages 8 and 9 of the report that was circulated talk about male employees specifically. I couldn't find where there was a separation between females and males. All of a sudden there were these two comments about male officers, and I wondered why they were about males specifically.