That's okay. I have a few other questions I want to get to here.
On February 3 that year there was a legal opinion that came to Treasury Board on interpreting section 33. It was abundantly clear on the question raised that there wasn't any discretion and that these liabilities had to be booked. That was point two in that legal opinion. Then, at warp speed--you remove them faster than Wal-Mart at that point, Madam Bloodworth--you had another lawyer commissioned on February 5 with a timeline. The lawyer said he needed the opinion at noon the next day. I was a lawyer too, and you've been a lawyer. To get a legal opinion on something as complex as this and to make it a 24-hour deadline, there must have been one huge crisis cooking around in your department to move it a this super-Wal-Mart speed. What was the crisis at that point? Was it the first legal opinion that you got from the Treasury Board that said this was not right, and you had to book that and you were rejecting that legal opinion and had to find another one?