I believe the reasoning was that the minister and the department had decided.... If I go back a bit, they had wanted to expand their occupancy or the space they needed. They ended up concluding that they didn't need to expand—so right there is a savings in the space utilization, but in other costs as well—and that they would stay where they were. We also got them to agree there would be no upgrade in their fit-up, which had been scheduled normally over the period they would be occupying such a space. That saved money as well.
I believe, Tim, it was $2 million or so, was it not, that was saved in the fit-up that was not done? So at the present time, for example, they're sitting there with some very old equipment and fit-up.
We've made efforts to make sure we mitigated the cost of their remaining where they were, as much as we could.