The whole issue itself.
Then you indicated here that the reason for the accounting was the context of this problem, or this issue, was that there was this notion that there might be need for supplementary estimates. That's what was really driving the concerns--was there a need for a supplementary estimate, and was that the subsequent fallout from the accounting? So there was an accounting component to it, and the fallout from that would be that if we were to book in a certain method, there would be a need for supplementary estimates. Is that fair?