On prescription drugs, for example, if we had a good system in place, over-prescriptions and all the harm that caused to people might have been prevented in the first case. Or if we a good system in place on the housing issue, then the mould problem might have been prevented. In both of those instances, a good system would actually save people money; it wouldn't cost more money. Are we in agreement on that?
On June 13th, 2006. See this statement in context.